Current:Home > MyTexas must remove floating Rio Grande border barrier, federal appeals court rules-LoTradeCoin
Texas must remove floating Rio Grande border barrier, federal appeals court rules
View Date:2024-12-25 12:29:07
Texas must move a floating barrier on the Rio Grande that drew backlash from Mexico, a federal appeals court ruled Friday, dealing a blow to one of Republican Gov. Greg Abbott's aggressive measures aimed at stopping migrants from entering the U.S. illegally.
The decision by the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals requires Texas to stop any work on the roughly 1,000-foot barrier and move it to the riverbank. The order sided with a lower court decision in September that Abbott called "incorrect" and had predicted would be overturned.
Instead, the New Orleans-based court handed Texas its second legal defeat this week over its border operations. On Wednesday, a federal judge allowed U.S. Border Patrol agents to continue cutting razor wire the state installed along the riverbank, despite the protests of Texas officials.
For months, Texas has asserted that parts of the Rio Grande are not subject to federal laws protecting navigable waters. But the judges said the lower court correctly sided with the Biden administration.
"It considered the threat to navigation and federal government operations on the Rio Grande, as well as the potential threat to human life the floating barrier created," Judge Dana Douglas wrote in the opinion.
Abbott called the decision "clearly wrong" in a statement on social media, and said the state would immediately seek a rehearing from the court.
"We'll go to SCOTUS if needed to protect Texas from Biden's open borders," Abbott posted.
The Biden administration sued Abbott over the linked and anchored buoys — which stretch roughly the length of three soccer fields — after the state installed the barrier along the international border with Mexico. The buoys are between the Texas border city of Eagle Pass and Piedras Negras, Coahuila.
Thousands of people were crossing into the U.S. illegally through the area when the barrier was installed. The lower district court ordered the state to move the barriers in September, but Texas' appeal temporarily delayed that order from taking effect.
The Biden administration sued under what is known as the Rivers and Harbors Act, a law that protects navigable waters.
In a dissent, Judge Don Willet, an appointee of former President Donald Trump and a former Texas Supreme Court justice, said the order to move the barriers won't dissolve any tensions that the Biden administration said have been ramping up between the U.S. and Mexico governments.
"If the district court credited the United States' allegations of harm, then it should have ordered the barrier to be not just moved but removed," Willet wrote. "Only complete removal would eliminate the "construction and presence" of the barrier and meet Mexico's demands."
Nearly 400,000 people tried to enter the U.S. through the section of the southwest border that includes Eagle Pass last fiscal year.
In the lower court's decision, U.S. District Judge David Ezra cast doubt on Texas' rationale for the barrier. He wrote at the time that the state produced no "credible evidence that the buoy barrier as installed has significantly curtailed illegal immigration."
Officials with U.S. Customs and Border Protection did not immediately comment.
- In:
- Texas
- Rio Grande
- Migrants
veryGood! (184)
Related
- South Carolina does not set a date for the next execution after requests for a holiday pause
- Inside Clean Energy: At a Critical Moment, the Coronavirus Threatens to Bring Offshore Wind to a Halt
- Aviation leaders call for more funds for the FAA after this week's system failure
- Get In on the Quiet Luxury Trend With Mind-Blowing Tory Burch Deals up to 70% Off
- Police cruiser strikes and kills a bicyclist pulling a trailer in Vermont
- Forests of the Living Dead
- Warming Trends: Stories of a Warming Sea, Spotless Dragonflies and Bad News for Shark Week
- In Georgia Senate Race, Warnock Brings a History of Black Faith Leaders’ Environmental Activism
- Up to 20 human skulls found in man's discarded bags, home in New Mexico
- 2 boys dead after rushing waters from open Oklahoma City dam gates sweep them away, authorities say
Ranking
- Republican Gabe Evans ousts Democratic US Rep. Yadira Caraveo in Colorado
- As Biden Eyes a Conservation Plan, Activists Fear Low-Income Communities and People of Color Could Be Left Out
- California’s Almond Trees Rely on Honey Bees and Wild Pollinators, but a Lack of Good Habitat is Making Their Job Harder
- The Pence-Harris Showdown Came up Well Short of an Actual ‘Debate’ on Climate Change
- Kevin Costner Shares His Honest Reaction to John Dutton's Controversial Fate on Yellowstone
- Inside Clean Energy: Rooftop Solar Wins Big in Kansas Court Ruling
- Inside Clean Energy: At a Critical Moment, the Coronavirus Threatens to Bring Offshore Wind to a Halt
- How Comedian Matt Rife Captured the Heart of TikTok—And Hot Mom Christina
Recommendation
-
Jennifer Lopez Gets Loud in Her First Onstage Appearance Amid Ben Affleck Divorce
-
The Acceleration of an Antarctic Glacier Shows How Global Warming Can Rapidly Break Up Polar Ice and Raise Sea Level
-
This snowplow driver just started his own service. But warmer winters threaten it
-
Bindi Irwin Shares How She Honors Her Late Dad Steve Irwin Every Day
-
Burt Bacharach, composer of classic songs, will have papers donated to Library of Congress
-
'It's like gold': Onions now cost more than meat in the Philippines
-
Minnesota man arrested over the hit-and-run death of his wife
-
Supreme Court’s Unusual Decision to Hear a Coal Case Could Deal President Biden’s Climate Plans Another Setback